The First Worst Camera of the Year Award 2013 Is Started At Photorumors

When it comes to the end of a year, various prizes are awarded to the new products of the year. You may even be confused that every new product will win 2 or 3 prizes of the year. Now, you have a chance to choose the worst one. Photorumors recently choose several products and provide the chance of voting. Which one is not your taste? Give it a vote.

The URL is: http://photorumors.com/2013/12/18/worst-camera-of-the-year-2013/

To specific devices:

Several websites are doing the best camera of the year awards, which is kind of getting boring. That's why this year I am introducing the first Worst Camera of the Year Award. I will keep this post pinned on top till the end of the year and then I will announce the winner (loser). Please vote and spread the word. Here are the nominees in a random order :

Leica X Vario ($2,850): a "mini M" was this not.

Hasselblad Stellar (unknown price): because the Lunar was not bad enough?

Pentax Q7 ($496.95): who is buying those?

Canon PowerShot N ($255): a camera with Facebook integration, would be great if we did not have smartphones.

Fujifilm X-A1 ($499): the X line is great, but don't we have enough models already?

Nikon 1 S1 ($279+): I think this was a joke.

Olympus Stylus 1 ($699): the OM-D is a great camera, but why make a mini-OM-D and sell it for $700?

Panasonic Lumix FZ70 ($279): with 20-1200mm lens - the only reason this camera exists is to show that 60x zoom compact is possible.

Samsung Galaxy Camera ($1,699): is it a camera or a tablet?

Sony Cybershot QX100 ($498): a self contain lens-camera module - a solution to a non-existing problem.