One of the biggest battles currently going on in the world of
photography is DSLRs versus mirrorless cameras. There’s no doubt that
DSLRs are still on top in terms of numbers, but as more and more
companies put their faith in the mirrorless market, they continue to
tempt consumers of all levels to give this five-year-old system a
chance.
In the video above, Amateur Photographer
decided to take a look into why DSLRs still hold a substantially larger
market share, and what weaknesses in the mirrorless market may be
causing this.
While the interviews in the video bring up some logical reasons, we
should start by noting that the research and insights are location
specific to the UK and, even then, there were a great deal of economic
factors not taken into account when coming up with the numbers. So,
grain of salt in hand, let’s take a look at what they found.
The possible reasons mentioned in the video as to why DSLRs are still
on top range from the plethora of choices — and therefore confusion —
that exists in the mirrorless market (Micro Four Thirds, mirrorless,
CSCs), to the lack of quality lens choices and accessories available for
mirrorless systems, to consumer fear of switching to the smaller
companies making the best of these camera systems.
It’s the last of those arguments as to why mirrorless sales are
slumping that is the most logical in my mind. The companies that are
creating the best mirrorless systems are companies such as Olympus, Sony
and Fujifilm, none of whom were held in particularly high regard in the
digital era until mirrorless came along.
Canon and Nikon have ruled the digital market for a very long time,
and yet neither of them seem to be producing quality mirrorless gear.
That’s probably why Fuji’s CEO said in an interview with DPReview
that even they wish Canon would jump in wholeheartedly — it would go a
long way in giving consumers confidence in mirrorless systems.
The camera market is an oligopoly, but in terms of sales, at times it almost seems like a duopoly between Canon and Nikon, which makes converting to a new system seem less attractive for newcomers and seasoned veterans alike.
The second issue of lens choice we can expect to sort itself out over
time, but if and only if consumers begin believing in this market even
as Canon and Nikon don’t show it much love. For our part, we can only
hope that the mirrorless market sorts itself out in all of these
regards, because it’s there that we’re seeing the most innovation.
The only other thing really left to be sorted out is the naming
scheme, which is ultimately up to the companies producing these systems.
The Micro Four Thirds system has already proven that companies can work
together with great results, and that’s what they need to keep doing
lest the entire market collapse under the weight of consumer confusion,
leaving everybody out of luck.
Of course, that’s just our take on what AP had to say.
Beyond the thoughts expressed in the video, what are some of your
concerns and qualms with the mirrorless camera market? Where would you
like to see improvements to this fairly new breed of camera system?
(via Photo Rumors and Petapixels)
No comments:
Post a Comment